Thoughts on startups by investors that
fund them & entrepreneurs that run them

The #1 Angel Investing Mistake

The list is of angel investing mistakes is an awfully long one, equally as long as the list for liquid investments, plus a bunch more.  On the too-aggressive side: believing the hockey stick, ignoring the management holes, and overestimating product acceptance.  On the too-conservative side: my favorite startup myth, thinking that because competitors exist, opportunity doesn’t. That logic is behind some of the biggest groans of regret ever, including the countless folks who said “no” to Google early on for that reason.

Despite all the competition, there’s a clear number one error in my book: failure to keep dry powder for the inevitable, yet somehow always unexpected, “re-opened” first rounds. My experience is that the best yielding exits come after a couple of re-ups at something right around the initial valuation. This isn’t surprising.  After all, the early stage world’s favorite word these days is either “pivot” or “iteration.”  We know that there will be dramatic twists and turns, which is why the “bet on the jockey, not the horse” mentality is so prevalent.  And yet, somehow, many angels don’t plan accordingly.

Sure, you’ll always have your stake in the company that needs just a bit more capital to get going.  But, obviously, you’ll get diluted in the process, and sometimes very badly. Some of the most successful early stage investors are exactly those who look for cash-strapped but promising companies, and then come in with heavy-preference money the entrepreneur can’t refuse.

Obviously, this doesn’t mean that you should pony up new cash every time you’re asked. And it doesn’t mean that you have to play at every subsequent stage of the company’s development.  But it does mean you should have the resources and patience to stay in the game when that bootstrapping startup misses a ship date, or has an early customer go out of business.  It also means you need to stay informed enough about the company along the way to make an informed gamble on which companies have hit the inevitable bumps in the road, and which are actually in the ditch beside it.

Nothing is more frustrating than having been “right” about a company, taken big risks to support it, and winding up with almost nothing on the exit. Don’t let it happen to you.

 

 

All opinions expressed are those of the author,  and do not necessarily represent those of Gust.

Written by Bob Rice

user Bob Rice Managing Partner,
Tangent Capital

Bob is Managing Partner of Tangent Capital, a registered broker-dealer and merchant bank focused on alternative assets and strategies. He is the resident industry expert on early stage and other private investments for Bloomberg TV, appearing daily as Contributing Editor on “Money Moves.” Bob is a Director of asset management companies with over $2 billion in AUM. Bob began his career as a trial attorney at the U.S. Department of Justice and then became a partner at Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy, where his practice centered on financial products. He left the law in 1996 to found a 3D graphics technology startup that eventually became the publicly traded Viewpoint, provider of the web’s first “rich media” advertising platform. He has been an active angel investor and startup mentor since 2004. Along the way, Bob also served as the Commissioner of the Professional Chess Association and authored the business strategy book Three Moves Ahead.

prev next

You might also be interested in

Measuring the Immeasurable: Evaluating Startups Qualitatively

At Hyde Park Angels, we evaluate startups based on quantifiable metrics related to traction, market size, and more.  But that’s not all we consider. In fact, sometimes the most important factors in determining whether we should invest are qualitative. While these can vary from deal to deal, there are a few that remain the same.

Understanding of the Pain

Read more >

Addressing the Dreaded Lifestyle Outcome

Three outcomes dominate exits of angel-funded companies:

Dead bugs – Startups that go out of business, returning less-than-invested capital to angels (usually zero).
Positive exits – Companies that liquidate with capital gains to investors, usually via a cash sale to a larger company.  While IPOs are possible, they are very rare for angel-funded companies.  The exits can range from simply return of

Read more >

Why Does Startup Pricing Vary by Location?

Entrepreneurs seem genuinely surprised to find that investors in Peoria or Little Rock are not willing to invest in startup companies at Silicon Valley prices.  After all, they just read in TechCrunch that investors funded a company similar to theirs at an $8 million pre-money valuation!

The valuation of startup companies shouldn’t be impacted by location, should they?  Guess again!  A

Read more >

How to Build a Unicorn From Scratch – and Walk Away with Nothing.

This is a grim fairy tale about a mythical company and its mythical founder. While I concocted this story, I did so by drawing upon my sixteen years of experience as a venture capitalist, plus the fourteen years I spent before that as an entrepreneur.  I’m going to use some pretty simple math and some pretty basic terms to create

Read more >

US Crowdfunding in 2014

Crowdfunding is the practice of raising money for a project or venture from a large number of people utilizing an Internet website or platform.  Funding from each individual can be quite small, $10 or less, although some projects have much higher minimums.  Projects include films, musical recordings, new companies, products, inventions, personal causes and many others.

Since the JOBS

Read more >

Comments