Schooling MBAs (part I)
Yesterday I was a judge at the Northeast Regional Finals of the Venture Capital Investment Competition, featuring teams of MBAs from some pretty fancy schools. The big idea is that the MBAs form imaginary VC firms, look at real startups, and get judged on how they handle due diligence, investment structures, etc. So it’s the MBA “investors,” not the startups, who are being judged. Needless to say, we heard lots of great insights and ideas from the teams; but there were also several teachable moments that we’ll examine in this and future posts.The most surprising area of confusion concerned “next round notes” or “convertible notes.” These are the loans early stage investors make to startups on the premise that the principle will convert into equity in a later, institutional investment round… but at a predetermined discount to the value the institutional investors set. It’s become a very common way to fund the earliest rounds, because, obviously, it kicks the difficult valuation can down the road until more is known, and circumvents other contentious issues as well.
One extremely surprising mistake two teams made was to ascribe negotiating value to the “note” feature because it purportedly affords superior investment protection, as compared to common stock, in the startup. Of course, creditors are indeed superior to equity holders during liquidation; but who cares if you’re first in line to recover money from a bankrupt startup? First and last will get the same thing: zero. Extraordinary cases aside, next round notes do not afford enough practical extra investment protection to justify the investor “giving” on other open negotiation points.
The second surprise was that the teams failed to negotiate valuation caps for the next round. (Here is a great explanation of valuation caps). If you don’t do that, you could be kicking yourself when the company becomes highly successful and raises a huge up round. Now, sure, you have your equity at a discount as compared to the institution; but you also own only a tiny portion of the company’s stock and haven’t been properly compensated for your risk. It was odd to hear the “VCs” argue, on the one hand, how much upside their target company had; but, on the other, fail to structure their investment accordingly.
And the third mistake the team made in negotiating their next round notes was simply not getting enough of a discount: two teams accepted 10%. That is simply not enough to compensate the early investors for the huge additional risk they’re taking … 20 or 30% is much more like it. In fact, if someone offers you a 10% discount on a Next Round Note, just change the order of the words and ask them to send you a note when they get to the next round. A 10% premium is nothing compared to the value you get from avoiding the risk and having the use of funds in the interim.
Written by Bob Rice
You might also be interested in
Urbanization is a defining process of modern life.
More than half of the world’s population now lives in cities, and the number of urban citizens around the world is projected to rise to 66% by 2050.
In the US, over 80% of the population lives in urban areas with 1 in 7 Americans living in New York, Los
Angel Investors Spotlight: An Inside Look at Hudson Valley Startup Fund’s Investment Process & Advice for Founders
Hudson Valley Startup Fund brings together a network of the region’s successful business and community leaders to give back, supporting the launch of the next Hudson Valley visionaries. We sat down with fund managers Chad Gomes, Johnny LeHane and Paul Hakim as they shared insights into their investment process, what they look for in both group members and startups, and
If you are a new entrepreneur, or entering a new business area, it’s always worth your time to assemble an Advisory Board of two or three executives who have travelled that road before. You need them before you need funding, and if you select the wrong people, or use them incorrectly, no amount of money will likely save your startup.
There are many wonderful ideas, and they are not necessarily easy to come up with. So congratulations on having thought of one!
“Having value” and “Being fundable” are two completely different things. What the more experienced responders here are saying is completely accurate: while a good idea is usually a necessary ingredient for the formation of a good company, it is
No, but there are several sets of courses on angel investing that can provide a good base from which to start. The most comprehensive and best known is the Power of Angel Investing seminar series developed by the Angel Resource Institute (formerly known as the Angel Capital Education Foundation, and prior to that part of the Angel Capital Association). It