I don’t file for patent protection often, but when I do, it’s provisional.
OK, the Most Interesting Man’s isn’t a lawyer, and his view is a bit simplistic. But he does have a point: in many cases, provisional patent applications can provide useful and inexpensive (if short term) protection for your brilliant new idea.Think of a provisional patent application as a placeholder. With it, you put everyone on notice that you claim to have invented some thing or process. (Fun bonus: you can label the invention “patent pending” at that moment.) You then have a year in which to file the rather daunting, full strength patent application. Assuming you do that properly, and that the patent is ultimately granted, your protection will relate back to the date on which the provisional application was filed.
Since you ultimately have to do the heavy lifting anyway, the extra step of filing a provisional might actually cost you time and money in the long run. So, what’s the point? Well, in many cases, marking your turf quickly and cheaply can be smart.
Take, for example, this common situation: An entrepreneur has invented a product or method that requires massive investment and infrastructure to turn into a profitable business. The logical idea is to approach strategic investors and partners. Those are the folks who can buy or invest and execute quickly… and also are the ones most likely to imitate the idea after forgetting its source. Meanwhile, the inventor hasn’t done the research to be 100% certain that the idea is totally novel, or even totally workable. So he’d like to defer the expense, time investment, and hassle of a full-blown application until after he’s tested the market a bit.
In cases like that, a provisional application can be like buying a cheap option. If no one cares about your idea, or if it actually turns out be old news, you’re out very little. If done right (and if followed up on in time) the provisional patent should protect you in the event you really have hit on something big and novel.
No short blog post can do justice to all the complex issues inherent in the decision about when, whether and how to seek patent protection, and I strongly recommend consulting a lawyer to help you think it through. But in those discussions, remember the words of the Most Interesting Man.
By the way, my fellow Gust blogger Antone Johnson has put out an excellent piece on overall IP issues for startups that I highly recommend; you might even guess who I’d recommend if you do happen to need some startup legal help.
All opinions expressed are those of the author, and do not necessarily represent those of Gust.
Written by Bob Rice
You might also be interested in
Today we’re proud to release an updated Co-founder Equity Split tool. We released the first version back in November to help startup founders divide the ownership of their startup fairly and rationally among their team. Since then, we’ve been collecting feedback from founders about how it could better help them with their decision.
With this release, the tool gives founders
Co-founder Equity Split: A New Framework to Objectively Divide Startup Ownership and Get Back to Building a Business
We’ve just released our free Co-founder Equity Split tool. It’ll give you a fair and objective recommendation about how to divide your startup’s ownership, so you and your co-founders will have a sensible, real starting point for this notoriously hard, crucially important conversation.
Many startup founders find themselves lacking clarity and direction when it comes time to divide their
Gust announces acquisitions of Sharewave and Preferred Return; creates the most robust and affordable equity management solution for early-stage startups.
June 22, 2016 – NEW YORK, NY – Gust, the global service provider powering the entrepreneurial ecosystem, announced today the launch of a comprehensive equity management platform, Gust Equity Management. The new platform provides early-stage companies with powerful
With startup growth up 61% since 2014 and more investment programs emerging, it can be overwhelming for founders to know just where to jump in. As the most startup-friendly accelerator on the planet, MassChallenge has helped 835 startup companies around the world, who have raised over $1.1 billion in funding and created over 6,500 jobs. We have seen startups at
Early-stage technology company valuations are generally a crap-shoot. Bill Payne did a great post about this in October 2011. This post builds on top of his work, and attempts to shed additional light on the valuation process.
New founders may think that startup valuations work like this:
I figure out what the value of my existing company is I figure