How does equity dilution work for startups?
Equity dilution works when the same pie is divided among more people. The Founder of a company starts by owning all the shares representing ownership of the company. Over time, other people receive pieces of equity in exchange for work (employee stock options), money (seed, angel and venture investors), services (attorneys, directors, etc.)
Because the total percentage of equity will always equal exactly 100%, every time anyone gets another piece, by definition it “dilutes” all of the previous equity holders. Therefore, to avoid dilution to its existing equity holders, all a company has to do is not hire any more employees who get options, or take any more money from investors.
Otherwise, the laws of mathematics are pretty immutable, because “protecting someone from dilution” simply means that someone *else* is going to get doubly diluted.*
To see this graphically check out the online Equity Simulator at OwnYourVenture.com:
*Advanced Discussion: Note that because any method of handling “anti-dilution protection” has the effect of helping the equity holder who is being protected at the cost of someone else, this type of provision is hotly negotiated, and is *always* for the benefit of investors at a cost to the founders and employees. In the real world, it is completely and absolutely unheard of for founders or employees to get prophylactic anti-dilution protection, because of the Golden Rule of Early Stage Investing: “the investor with the gold makes the rules”.
That being said, there are certain circumstances where management (but virtuallynever founders or rank-and-file employees) has the negotiating leverage to get *some* protection for themselves. This typically happens when the company is facing tough times, and the value of management’s original options has greatly decreased to the point that the equity no longer serves as an incentive for staying with the company. In that case, faced with a potential exodus of management needed to keep the company going, investors might do a one-time management option grant to effectively protect some of their equity, or, if the company is positioned for sale, promise them a “management carve out” from the proceeds of the sale (which means management gets a stated piece of the cash up front, before the investors).
Rather more common is the practice of “evergreening” employee options, in which employees are given one or more additional option grants once their original grants have fully (or partially) vested. That keeps the carrot out ahead of the employee, with a continuing incentive for remaining with the company (otherwise, once all the options are vested after four years, there is theoretically no additional equity benefit to the employees in sticking around.)
*original post can be found on Quora @ http://www.quora.com/David-S-Rose/answers *
Written by David S. Rose
You might also be interested in
Canada has not tapped its female angel investor potential – yet.
The female angel investor conversation has been discussed inside and out. From TechCrunch, BetaKit to the Financial Post, there have been more than a few arguments made about the lack of female representation in Canada’s early-stage investment community and the benefits of tapping into this financial resource.
One of the most common questions we get is: What are the biggest challenges and rewards of angel investing? High net worth individuals become angel investors for a number of reasons, but the opportunity to work with entrepreneurs and provide guidance to founders is typically high on the list. In this video, angel investor Chenoa Farnsworth explains why, interestingly, both the biggest
Entrepreneurs seem genuinely surprised to find that investors in Peoria or Little Rock are not willing to invest in startup companies at Silicon Valley prices. After all, they just read in TechCrunch that investors funded a company similar to theirs at an $8 million pre-money valuation!
The valuation of startup companies shouldn’t be impacted by location, should they? Guess again!
The first question you need to ask is “What country are you in?” and the second is “Are you an Accredited Investor by that country’s standards?”
If we’re talking about the US and you are NOT at the Accredited level ($1 million in investable assets, or $200,000 annual income), then for the moment you are actually not allowed to invest in privately held startups
First, it’s important to understand that the four platforms you list fall into two very distinct groups.
Kickstarter and IndieGoGo are project-based crowdfunding platforms through which anyone can contribute money, either as a donation or with the promise that they will receive a tangible ‘reward’ of some kind if the project is successful.
Gust and AngelList are equity-based platforms, used by Accredited Investors to facilitate the investment of money for an ownership interest in