Thoughts on startups by investors that
fund them & entrepreneurs that run them

Angel Investors on Burn Rate and Great Now or Great Later

Here’s an interesting question. It came up Tuesday night in an angel investment meeting:

My question is which looks better to investors: A higher burn rate with three great people on the business plan, or a lower burn rate with only two great people on the business plan? Two of the three want salary, not equity, and one of those two has a skill set that we need later, in growth phases, and not so much right now, in development phase. Also important to mention; we have three amazing advisors on the plan to beef it up as well.

My answer:

  1. Just a word of caution: “great” and “amazing” are overused words. Are they really?
  2. Most angel investors would much rather have a higher burn rate with three “great people” with different core skill sets than a lower burn rate with two “great people.” That would be a no-brainer.
  3. Most angel investors think of the burn rate as a temporary reality that growth and investment will solve. If your business isn’t likely to grow fast, then they aren’t that interested anyhow.
  4. Most investors want the founders to be well paid, but not more than market value, maybe even a tad less because they’re building a company and looking to win later on by having some equity ownership.
  5. It’s believable that some great people can be in a financial situation requiring a market-rate salary, but it’s also disappointing to see someone in the early stages that doesn’t want any ownership at all.
  6. It’s not so good to see a plan depending on somebody who wants to make a high salary from a startup, relatively high compared to market value, and no equity.
  7. People who want all money and no ownership are not as credible as co-founders because they are way more likely to leave when things get tough, or, simply, when they get a better salary offer.
  8. If one of the three great people isn’t extremely useful until a year or two from now, then rethink; maybe he or she is not so great. Great people are useful now, not later.
  9. Another option: keep that useful-later great person in the mix contributing part-time for options, with a promise that he or she go full time and on salary later, as soon as funding or revenue allow it.
  10. Most investors are skeptical about advisors, amazing or not, unless they are tied into the company with stock options or some other skin in the game.

 

All opinions expressed are those of the author,  and do not necessarily represent those of Gust.

Written by Tim Berry

user Tim Berry

Tim is the founder of Palo Alto Software and bplans.com, the co-founder of Borland International, and the official business planning coach at Entrepreneur.com. He has been called the "Obi-wan Kenobe of business planning" and "The Father of Business Planning." He is a serial author of books and software on business planning.

prev next

You might also be interested in

How to Give Women the Wings of an Angel

Canada has not tapped its female angel investor potential – yet.

The female angel investor conversation has been discussed inside and out. From TechCrunch, BetaKit to the Financial Post, there have been more than a few arguments made about the lack of female representation in Canada’s early-stage investment community and the benefits of tapping into this financial resource.

For example,

Read more >

Challenges and Rewards for Angel Investors

One of the most common questions we get is: What are the biggest challenges and rewards of angel investing? High net worth individuals become angel investors for a number of reasons, but the opportunity to work with entrepreneurs and provide guidance to founders is typically high on the list. In this video, angel investor Chenoa Farnsworth explains why, interestingly, both the biggest

Read more >

Measuring the Immeasurable: Evaluating Startups Qualitatively

At Hyde Park Angels, we evaluate startups based on quantifiable metrics related to traction, market size, and more.  But that’s not all we consider. In fact, sometimes the most important factors in determining whether we should invest are qualitative. While these can vary from deal to deal, there are a few that remain the same.

Understanding of

Read more >

Why Does Startup Pricing Vary by Location?

Entrepreneurs seem genuinely surprised to find that investors in Peoria or Little Rock are not willing to invest in startup companies at Silicon Valley prices.  After all, they just read in TechCrunch that investors funded a company similar to theirs at an $8 million pre-money valuation!

The valuation of startup companies shouldn’t be impacted by location, should they?  Guess again! 

Read more >

US Crowdfunding in 2014

Crowdfunding is the practice of raising money for a project or venture from a large number of people utilizing an Internet website or platform.  Funding from each individual can be quite small, $10 or less, although some projects have much higher minimums.  Projects include films, musical recordings, new companies, products, inventions, personal causes and many others.

Since the

Read more >

Comments