Addressing the Dreaded Lifestyle Outcome
Three outcomes dominate exits of angel-funded companies:
- Dead bugs – Startups that go out of business, returning less-than-invested capital to angels (usually zero).
- Positive exits – Companies that liquidate with capital gains to investors, usually via a cash sale to a larger company. While IPOs are possible, they are very rare for angel-funded companies. The exits can range from simply return of capital to wildly exiting multiples.
- The living dead – These companies continue indefinitely to operate with internally generated cash without pursuing an exit. By intention or due to market forces, these entrepreneurs turn what at first appeared to be a high-growth opportunity into a lifestyle company, that is, a company that meets payroll for all employees but does not demonstrate sufficient upside potential to attract buyers. Such companies are going sideways and, as such, offer no opportunities to angels to harvest their investment – not even to write off their investment. There are also examples of entrepreneurs who “get comfortable” with the income provided by their startup companies and simply choose not to pursue an exit.
What can investors do to protect themselves against the dreaded lifestyle outcome?
There are at least two investment terms that can be negotiated in advance of closing an angel round that help mitigate the “living dead” outcome:
Redemption: This common deal term requires the entrepreneur/company to repurchase investor shares if an exit does not occur within a reasonable period of time, providing some upside to the investors via a small multiple of capital invested or with interest added to the capital, as if the capital infusion were debt. Here is how redemption rights are defined in the model term sheet of the National Venture Capital Association for a Series A Preferred round:
Unless prohibited by (state) law governing distributions to stockholders, the Series A Preferred shall be redeemable at the option of holders of at least [__]% of the Series A Preferred commencing any time after[________] at a price equal to the Original Purchase Price [plus all accrued but unpaid dividends]. Redemption shall occur in three equal annual portions. Upon a redemption request from the holders of the required percentage of the Series A Preferred, all Series A Preferred shares shall be redeemed [(except for any Series A holders who affirmatively opt-out)].
In footnotes, NVCA adds: “Redemption rights allow Investors to force the Company to redeem their shares at cost (and sometimes investors may also request a small guaranteed rate of return, in the form of a dividend). In practice, redemption rights are not often used; however, they do provide a form of exit and some possible leverage over the Company.” It is also clear that in certain states and under certain conditions, redemption may not be enforceable. Nonetheless, redemption rights clearly specify the exits intentions of the investors.
Shared Governance: This concept is one in which neither the founders nor the investors have voting control of the Board of Directors. Here is how the Model Term Sheet for Alliance of Angels describes an appropriate Board of Directors:
The holders of a majority of the Series A Preferred shall be entitled to elect one member of the board of directors, who shall initially be ________. At the time of the closing of this financing, the board of directors shall be 5 members: 1 from management, 1 from Series A, and 3 independent directors acceptable to both common and Series A directors.
Clearly, any board of five directors in which neither the founders nor the investors have three voting members would satisfy this concept. Appropriate make-up might be two founders, two investors and one independent agreed upon by the other four or even one founders, two investors and two agreed upon by the other three.
Since the Board of Directors selects the CEO, shared governance, as described above, general provides sufficient leverage for investors to guide the company towards an appropriate exit in a reasonable period of time.
Five-director Boards with shared governance are rather common among angel-funded startups and are generally considered better practice. Redemption rights, while less common in Silicon Valley than elsewhere in the US, are excellent leverage for investors to keep the management of angel-funded companies driving towards exits.
This post originally appeared in the ACA Blog.
Written by Bill Payne
You might also be interested in
Today we’re proud to release an updated Co-founder Equity Split tool. We released the first version back in November to help startup founders divide the ownership of their startup fairly and rationally among their team. Since then, we’ve been collecting feedback from founders about how it could better help them with their decision.
With this release, the tool gives founders
Co-founder Equity Split: A New Framework to Objectively Divide Startup Ownership and Get Back to Building a Business
We’ve just released our free Co-founder Equity Split tool. It’ll give you a fair and objective recommendation about how to divide your startup’s ownership, so you and your co-founders will have a sensible, real starting point for this notoriously hard, crucially important conversation.
Many startup founders find themselves lacking clarity and direction when it comes time to divide their
Gust announces acquisitions of Sharewave and Preferred Return; creates the most robust and affordable equity management solution for early-stage startups.
June 22, 2016 – NEW YORK, NY – Gust, the global service provider powering the entrepreneurial ecosystem, announced today the launch of a comprehensive equity management platform, Gust Equity Management. The new platform provides early-stage companies with powerful
With startup growth up 61% since 2014 and more investment programs emerging, it can be overwhelming for founders to know just where to jump in. As the most startup-friendly accelerator on the planet, MassChallenge has helped 835 startup companies around the world, who have raised over $1.1 billion in funding and created over 6,500 jobs. We have seen startups at
Early-stage technology company valuations are generally a crap-shoot. Bill Payne did a great post about this in October 2011. This post builds on top of his work, and attempts to shed additional light on the valuation process.
New founders may think that startup valuations work like this:
I figure out what the value of my existing company is I figure