Valuations 101: The Dave Berkus Method
We recently started a series of posts on establishing the pre-money valuation of pre-revenue startup companies for purposes of investment by seed and startup investors.
Dave Berkus is a founding member of the Tech Coast Angels in Southern California, a lecturer and educator. He has invested in more than 70 startup ventures. Dave’s valuation model first appeared in a book published by Harvard’s Howard Stevenson in the middle nineties. It has been used by angels since, however Dave updated the model for 2009 ACA Leaders Workshop in Richardson, TX. Here is his latest version.
|Characteristic||Add to Pre-money Valuation|
|Quality Management Team||Zero to $0.5 million|
|Sound Idea||Zero to $0.5 million|
|Working Prototype||Zero to $0.5 million|
|Quality Board of Directors||Zero to $0.5 million|
|Product Rollout or Sales||Zero to $0.5 million|
Note that the numbers are the maximum for each class (not absolutes) so a valuation can be $800K (or less) as easily as $2.5 million. Furthermore, Dave reminds us that “it was created specifically for the earliest stage investments as a way to find a starting point without relying upon the founder’s financial forecasts.”
I have several comments on the Berkus Method:
- This is a very useful method and should be in an investor’s valuation toolbox.
- It is good to establish some triggers for fundable companies. For example, some investors would not fund a company without at least a minimum of customer feedback or intellectual property. It is always a good idea for angels to establish the minimum expectations for fundable companies.
- Some issues or characteristics may be missing from Dave’s methodology.
- Is the competitive environment important in the business sector of the target venture? If so, perhaps consideration of such value should be considered.
- Is the depth of intellectual property and competitive differentiation important to the target venture? If so, perhaps consideration of such value should be considered.
- Is the size of the opportunity to investors considering funding this target company? If so, perhaps consideration of such value should be considered.
However, referring to #2 above, it is possible for investors to consider each of these three characteristics as minimum triggers for investment. If present, then Dave’s valuation is sound.
Best practice for angels investing in pre-revenue ventures is to use multiple methods for establishing the pre-money valuation for seed/startup companies. The Dave Berkus method is useful as one such method. In recent posts, I have described the Scorecard Method and the Venture Capital Method as other important methodologies for determining the pre-money valuation of pre-revenue seed/startup ventures. In future posts, I will describe additional methods.
Written by Bill Payne
You might also be interested in
When entrepreneurs come to me with that “million dollar idea,” I have to tell them that an idea alone is really worth nothing. It’s all about the execution, and investors invest in the people who can execute, or even better, have a history of successful execution. Execution is making things happen, and for startups it usually means making change happen,
I’ve always wondered who started the urban myth that the best way to start a company is to come up with a great idea, and then find some professional investors to give you a pot of money to build a company. In my experience, that’s actually the worst way to start, for reasons I will outline here,
Steve Jobs was one of those entrepreneurs who seemed universally either loved or hated, but not many will argue with his ability to innovate in the technology product arena over the years. He was instrumental in creating Apple, which has pioneered a dazzling array of new products, and even surpassed Microsoft, to become the
If you are a new entrepreneur, or entering a new business area, it’s always worth your time to assemble an Advisory Board of two or three executives who have travelled that road before. You need them before you need funding, and if you select the wrong people, or use them incorrectly, no
Helpers do what you say, while good help does what you need, without you saying anything. People who can help you the most are actually smarter than you, at least in their domain. Top entrepreneurs spend more time putting the right team in place to accomplish their objectives than they spend on any