Valuations 101: The Dave Berkus Method
We recently started a series of posts on establishing the pre-money valuation of pre-revenue startup companies for purposes of investment by seed and startup investors.
Dave Berkus is a founding member of the Tech Coast Angels in Southern California, a lecturer and educator. He has invested in more than 70 startup ventures. Dave’s valuation model first appeared in a book published by Harvard’s Howard Stevenson in the middle nineties. It has been used by angels since, however Dave updated the model for 2009 ACA Leaders Workshop in Richardson, TX. Here is his latest version.
|Characteristic||Add to Pre-money Valuation|
|Quality Management Team||Zero to $0.5 million|
|Sound Idea||Zero to $0.5 million|
|Working Prototype||Zero to $0.5 million|
|Quality Board of Directors||Zero to $0.5 million|
|Product Rollout or Sales||Zero to $0.5 million|
Note that the numbers are the maximum for each class (not absolutes) so a valuation can be $800K (or less) as easily as $2.5 million. Furthermore, Dave reminds us that “it was created specifically for the earliest stage investments as a way to find a starting point without relying upon the founder’s financial forecasts.”
I have several comments on the Berkus Method:
- This is a very useful method and should be in an investor’s valuation toolbox.
- It is good to establish some triggers for fundable companies. For example, some investors would not fund a company without at least a minimum of customer feedback or intellectual property. It is always a good idea for angels to establish the minimum expectations for fundable companies.
- Some issues or characteristics may be missing from Dave’s methodology.
- Is the competitive environment important in the business sector of the target venture? If so, perhaps consideration of such value should be considered.
- Is the depth of intellectual property and competitive differentiation important to the target venture? If so, perhaps consideration of such value should be considered.
- Is the size of the opportunity to investors considering funding this target company? If so, perhaps consideration of such value should be considered.
However, referring to #2 above, it is possible for investors to consider each of these three characteristics as minimum triggers for investment. If present, then Dave’s valuation is sound.
Best practice for angels investing in pre-revenue ventures is to use multiple methods for establishing the pre-money valuation for seed/startup companies. The Dave Berkus method is useful as one such method. In recent posts, I have described the Scorecard Method and the Venture Capital Method as other important methodologies for determining the pre-money valuation of pre-revenue seed/startup ventures. In future posts, I will describe additional methods.
How does your venture stack up? Get free investor-grade startup feedback in just 15 minutes >>
Written by Bill Payne
You might also be interested in
Canada has not tapped its female angel investor potential – yet.
The female angel investor conversation has been discussed inside and out. From TechCrunch, BetaKit to the Financial Post, there have been more than a few arguments made about the lack of female representation in Canada’s early-stage investment community and the benefits of tapping into this financial resource.
One of the most common questions we get is: What are the biggest challenges and rewards of angel investing? High net worth individuals become angel investors for a number of reasons, but the opportunity to work with entrepreneurs and provide guidance to founders is typically high on the list. In this video, angel investor Chenoa Farnsworth explains why, interestingly, both the biggest
Entrepreneurs seem genuinely surprised to find that investors in Peoria or Little Rock are not willing to invest in startup companies at Silicon Valley prices. After all, they just read in TechCrunch that investors funded a company similar to theirs at an $8 million pre-money valuation!
The valuation of startup companies shouldn’t be impacted by location, should they? Guess again!
The first question you need to ask is “What country are you in?” and the second is “Are you an Accredited Investor by that country’s standards?”
If we’re talking about the US and you are NOT at the Accredited level ($1 million in investable assets, or $200,000 annual income), then for the moment you are actually not allowed to invest in privately held startups
First, it’s important to understand that the four platforms you list fall into two very distinct groups.
Kickstarter and IndieGoGo are project-based crowdfunding platforms through which anyone can contribute money, either as a donation or with the promise that they will receive a tangible ‘reward’ of some kind if the project is successful.
Gust and AngelList are equity-based platforms, used by Accredited Investors to facilitate the investment of money for an ownership interest in